« The DNA Ancestry Collection Kit | Main | Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)--A mother's legacy »

December 20, 2007

Is it always better to purchase the highest marker test?

We are often asked about the number of markers one should consider when deciding to purchase a DNA test: "Is it always better to purchase the highest marker test?" The more markers two individuals can compare, the more precisely they can determine whether they could be related-based on a tighter Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) result. Conversely, matching too few markers will not result in a genealogically relevant time frame.

The answer, however, is not as simple as "more markers equal better results."  After 45 - 50 markers, you would need a test consisting of 100 markers or more to significantly narrow the MRCA range.

It is the marriage of genetics and genealogy that provides the greatest insight into potential connections. Thus it is important to compare the genealogies of potential matches alongside the DNA results. DNA Ancestry provides tools such as our matching map, pedigree comparison, and connection (e-mail) service, along with Ancestry.com's research databases and family trees that help family historians with their questions of connectivity. If you have specific questions on which test is right for you, please feel free to contact us at any time.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ed953a6883300e54fa9e0738834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is it always better to purchase the highest marker test? :

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment